<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Travel Problems Solved, Now What?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gleefulgecko.com/archives/1267/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gleefulgecko.com/archives/1267/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.gleefulgecko.com/archives/1267/comment-page-1/#comment-16659</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gleefulgecko.com/archives/1267/#comment-16659</guid>
		<description>It works already.  People still travel back in time to comment on the Jeremy Clarkson story.

Will it only be people with strong opinions who travel back in time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It works already.  People still travel back in time to comment on the Jeremy Clarkson story.</p>
<p>Will it only be people with strong opinions who travel back in time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.gleefulgecko.com/archives/1267/comment-page-1/#comment-16622</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gleefulgecko.com/archives/1267/#comment-16622</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... The article seems to indicate that this would be one of the more logically consistent time machines.  That is, you would only be able to go to places and times where the machine already existed and was in operation.  That being the case, I'd be afraid to turn it on.  How many times in the future would someone want to "go back as far as I can"?  The moment you turned it on, people would come pouring out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; The article seems to indicate that this would be one of the more logically consistent time machines.  That is, you would only be able to go to places and times where the machine already existed and was in operation.  That being the case, I&#8217;d be afraid to turn it on.  How many times in the future would someone want to &#8220;go back as far as I can&#8221;?  The moment you turned it on, people would come pouring out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
