<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thunderbolt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gleefulgecko.com/archives/408/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gleefulgecko.com/archives/408/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.gleefulgecko.com/archives/408/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gleefulgecko.com/archives/408/#comment-314</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, that would be the application of EOD rule #7: There is no problem in the universe that cannot be solved with the proper application of high explosives.

Having said that, the problem becomes finding a commander that will allow the use of HE in such creative ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, that would be the application of EOD rule #7: There is no problem in the universe that cannot be solved with the proper application of high explosives.</p>
<p>Having said that, the problem becomes finding a commander that will allow the use of HE in such creative ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.gleefulgecko.com/archives/408/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gleefulgecko.com/archives/408/#comment-308</guid>
		<description>On the one hand, probably a lot easier to work on our own devices
where you have the manuals/schematics, etc.  On the other, I wonder
about the following sort of conversation (from my imagination, in a Bob
Newhart sort of voice):

Well Colonel, I understand that the C-130 is a very expensive aircraft
but this one does have a lot of SAM damage and I&#039;m afraid that my crew
and I don&#039;t have much experience working on a daisy cutter twisted into
a pretzel.  So, it&#039;s my recommendation that it be taxied out to the end of
45R and we&#039;ll remotely detonate it in place.  Uh, we&#039;ll be happy to help
the field maintenance crew clean up whatever is left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the one hand, probably a lot easier to work on our own devices<br />
where you have the manuals/schematics, etc.  On the other, I wonder<br />
about the following sort of conversation (from my imagination, in a Bob<br />
Newhart sort of voice):</p>
<p>Well Colonel, I understand that the C-130 is a very expensive aircraft<br />
but this one does have a lot of SAM damage and I&#8217;m afraid that my crew<br />
and I don&#8217;t have much experience working on a daisy cutter twisted into<br />
a pretzel.  So, it&#8217;s my recommendation that it be taxied out to the end of<br />
45R and we&#8217;ll remotely detonate it in place.  Uh, we&#8217;ll be happy to help<br />
the field maintenance crew clean up whatever is left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.gleefulgecko.com/archives/408/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 04:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gleefulgecko.com/archives/408/#comment-306</guid>
		<description>Yeah, they call us in for emergencies dealing with ordnance, generally if something fails to fire/release or a jammed gun we get called.  We also occasionally work on ejection seats if there is something wrong with the explosive components or there has been a crash or successful ejection (not all the components activate during an ejection).  We also deal with malfunctioned counter measures when necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, they call us in for emergencies dealing with ordnance, generally if something fails to fire/release or a jammed gun we get called.  We also occasionally work on ejection seats if there is something wrong with the explosive components or there has been a crash or successful ejection (not all the components activate during an ejection).  We also deal with malfunctioned counter measures when necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.gleefulgecko.com/archives/408/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gleefulgecko.com/archives/408/#comment-305</guid>
		<description>&quot;they’re really easy to work on from an EOD perspective&quot;
Hmmm... I didn&#039;t realize that was in your job spec.  So, if
I understand correctly, when a combat aircraft lands with
unexploded (but damaged???) ordnance they call you to
get it off the airframe and get rid of it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;they’re really easy to work on from an EOD perspective&#8221;<br />
Hmmm&#8230; I didn&#8217;t realize that was in your job spec.  So, if<br />
I understand correctly, when a combat aircraft lands with<br />
unexploded (but damaged???) ordnance they call you to<br />
get it off the airframe and get rid of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.gleefulgecko.com/archives/408/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gleefulgecko.com/archives/408/#comment-304</guid>
		<description>The Thunderbolt is definitely a cool plane.  An interesting note, the A-10 &lt;a href=&quot;http3A2F2Fwww.af.mil2Ffactsheets2Ffactsheet.asp3FfsID3D70&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Thunderbolt II&lt;/a&gt;
 (commonly referred to as the Warthog) could pretty much fit Brett&#039;s description.  The A-10 is ugly as sin, but fulfills its roll as a close are support/tank hunter beautilfully, plus they&#039;re really easy to work on from an EOD perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Thunderbolt is definitely a cool plane.  An interesting note, the A-10 <a href="http3A2F2Fwww.af.mil2Ffactsheets2Ffactsheet.asp3FfsID3D70" rel="nofollow">Thunderbolt II</a><br />
 (commonly referred to as the Warthog) could pretty much fit Brett&#8217;s description.  The A-10 is ugly as sin, but fulfills its roll as a close are support/tank hunter beautilfully, plus they&#8217;re really easy to work on from an EOD perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

